Sara Price leads Alignment Training at Anthropic. Sara's research focuses on alignment training that generalizes reliably, including methods for reducing agentic misalignment.
Roger Grosse is an associate professor of computer science at the University of Toronto and a member of Anthropic’s Alignment Science team, where he works on training data attribution. He earned his PhD in computer science from MIT.
Xander Davies is a Member of the Technical Staff at the UK AI Security Institute, where he leads the Red Teaming group, which uses adversarial ML techniques to understand, attack, and mitigate frontier AI safeguards. He is also a PhD student at the University of Oxford, supervised by Dr. Yarin Gal. He previously studied computer science at Harvard, where he founded and led the Harvard AI Safety Team.
I am a principal investigator at the ELLIS Institute Tübingen and the Max Planck Institute for Intelligent Systems, where I lead the AI Safety and Alignment group. I also serve as chapter lead for the new edition of the International AI Safety Report chaired by Prof. Yoshua Bengio. I have worked on AI safety with leading organizations in the field (OpenAI, Anthropic, UK AI Safety Institute, Center for AI Safety, Gray Swan AI). I obtained my PhD in machine learning from EPFL in 2024 advised by Prof. Nicolas Flammarion. My PhD thesis was awarded the Patrick Denantes Memorial Prize for the best thesis in the CS department of EPFL and was supported by the Google and Open Phil AI PhD Fellowships.
I like to make computers do interesting things, deeply understand concepts and build interesting, useful tools. I’m currently thinking about AI alignment, control, and evaluations, and work with frontier models at METR.
Recent work I've done involves MALT, training models to fool monitors in QA settings and RE-Bench.
I've previously worked at Stripe and CSM, and did a concurrent BSc/MSc in Computer Science at Brown.
I’m a Research Scientist in MIT CSAIL with the MIT-IBM Watson AI Lab. I did my PhD in Brain and Cognitive Sciences at MIT, as an NSF Fellow working with Josh Tenenbaum and Antonio Torralba. My work investigates representations underlying intelligence in artificial (and previously, biological) neural networks.
Jacob Hilton is a researcher at the Alignment Research Center (ARC), a nonprofit working on the theoretical foundations of mechanistic interpretability. He previously worked at OpenAI on reinforcement learning from human feedback, scaling laws and interpretability. His background is in pure mathematics, and he holds a PhD in set theory from the University of Leeds, UK.
Eli is working on AI scenario forecasting with the AI Futures Project, where he co-authored AI 2027. He advises Sage, an organization he cofounded that works on AI Digest (interactive AI explainers) and forecasting tools. He previously worked on the AI-powered research assistant Elicit.
As AI Science Advisor to the California Governor’s Office of Emergency Services (Cal OES), Michael Chen advises senior leadership on frontier AI safety and risk assessment, with a particular emphasis on critical safety incidents, AI and cyber defense, and risk from developers’ internal deployment of AI, such as sabotage by AI agents and automated AI R&D. As Science Advisor, he coordinates with AI governance leads across California’s state government and facilitates cross-sector collaboration with the academic research community, the private sector, and community and nonprofit organizations.
Michael previously worked on evaluations-based AI governance at METR, an independent California-based nonprofit evaluator of autonomous AI agent capabilities and risks. He advised leading AI developers on frameworks for assessing, mitigating, and transparently disclosing catastrophic AI risks. He also assisted with third-party evaluations, including a review of a developer’s report assessing sabotage risk from AI agents, and contributed to a catalog of incidents in which AI agents acted beyond their operators’ intent. Michael has engaged with U.S. government bodies on frontier AI evaluation, including the Center for AI Standards and Innovation (CAISI) at the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), and conducted research at UC Berkeley’s Center for Human-Compatible AI on learning human preferences for language models. His research and commentary on AI have been covered in outlets such as Time, The Guardian, and MIT Technology Review. Michael is a part-time PhD student at the University of Oxford and an affiliate of the Oxford Martin AI Governance Initiative.
I’m a Member of Technical Staff at OpenAI working on monitoring LLM agents for misalignment. Previously, I worked on AI control and safety cases at the UK AI Security Institute and on honesty post-training at Anthropic. Before that, I did a PhD at the University of Sussex with Chris Buckley and Anil Seth focusing on RL from human feedback (RLHF) and spent time as a visiting researcher at NYU working with Ethan Perez, Sam Bowman and Kyunghyun Cho.
The MATS Program is a 10-week research fellowship designed to train and support emerging researchers working on AI alignment, transparency and security. Fellows collaborate with world-class mentors, receive dedicated research management support, and join a vibrant community in Berkeley focused on advancing safe and reliable AI. The program provides the structure, resources, and mentorship needed to produce impactful research and launch long-term careers in AI safety.
MATS mentors are leading researchers from a broad range of AI safety, alignment, governance, field-building and security domains. They include academics, industry researchers, and independent experts who guide scholars through research projects, provide feedback, and help shape each scholar’s growth as a researcher. The mentors represent expertise in areas such as:
Key dates
Application:
The main program will then run from September 28th to December 4th, with the extension phase for accepted fellows beginning in December.
MATS accepts applicants from diverse academic and professional backgrounds - from machine learning, mathematics, and computer science to policy, economics, physics, cognitive science, biology, and public health, as well as founders, operators, and field-builders without traditional research backgrounds. The primary requirements are strong motivation to contribute to AI safety and evidence of technical aptitude, research potential, or relevant operational experience. Prior AI safety experience is helpful but not required.
Applicants submit a general application, applying to various tracks (Empirical, Theory, Strategy & Forecasting, Policy & Governance, Systems Security, Biosecurity, Founding & Field-Building.
In stage 2, applicants apply to streams within those tracks as well as completing track specific evaluations.
After a centralized review period, applicants who are advanced will then undergo additional evaluations depending on the preferences of the streams they've applied to before doing final interviews and receiving offers.
For more information on how to get into MATS, please look at this page.