No items found.

Luca Righetti

This stream is primarily interested in mentoring projects in biosecurity that either (1) create rigorous threat models of AI biological misuse or (2) create benchmarks and tools that allow us to evaluate and mitigate these risks, as well as verifying that companies are taking suitable precautions.

Stream overview

Potential example projects for this stream include:

  • Threat Model: What do inference compute trends imply for how fast dangerous biological capabilities may proliferate and become harder to monitor?
  • Evaluations: Formalizing "scientific ideation in an empirical field" in a manner that allows one to assess human and LLM-generated hypotheses for novelty, plausibility, etc.
  • Mitigations: Developing a way to more richly assess and describe the "blast radius" or "collateral damage" of efforts to remove-in-pretraining or unlearn material from LLMs
  • Verification: How are we better able to standardize and compare the effectiveness of classifiers from different AI companies and assess how much they reduce misuse risk?

Mentors

No items found.

Mentorship style

Typically, this would include weekly meetings, detailed comments on drafts, and asynchronous messaging.

Fellows we are looking for

For threat modeling work: Skeptical mindset, transparent reasoning, analytical

For evaluations, mitigations, and verification work: LLM engineering skills (e.g., agent orchestration), biosecurity knowledge

Mentorship will be a collaboration between me and my team at GovAI. The specifics depend on the candidate and project.

I am based in Berkley -- and some of my team is based in London.

Project selection

Mentor(s) will talk through project ideas with scholar

Streams

The Winter 2027 cohort offers a wide range of research streams led by experts across AI alignment, interpretability, governance, and safety. Each stream provides its own research agenda, methodology, and mentorship focus.

London
Empirical
Interpretability
London
Interpretability, Red-Teaming, Monitoring
London
Monitoring, Adversarial Robustness, Control, Model Organisms, Red-Teaming, Dangerous Capability Evals, Safeguards
New York City
Dangerous Capability Evals, Control, Strategy & Forecasting, Policy & Governance, Scalable Oversight, Agent Foundations
SF Bay Area
Empirical
Theory
Dangerous Capability Evals, Adversarial Robustness, Security, Red-Teaming, Scalable Oversight
London
Control, Scheming & Deception, Dangerous Capability Evals, Monitoring
Washington, D.C.
Policy & Governance, Strategy & Forecasting
Oxford
AI Welfare
SF Bay Area
Control, Model Organisms, Scheming & Deception, Strategy & Forecasting
SF Bay Area
Interpretability
Tübingen
Dangerous Capability Evals, Agent Foundations, Adversarial Robustness, Monitoring, Scalable Oversight, Scheming & Deception
SF Bay Area
Dangerous Capability Evals, Policy & Governance
New York City
Monitoring, Dangerous Capability Evals, Scalable Oversight, Safeguards
SF Bay Area
Strategy & Forecasting, Policy & Governance
Montreal
Agent Foundations, Dangerous Capability Evals, Monitoring, Control, Red-Teaming, Scalable Oversight
SF Bay Area
Control, Model Organisms, Red-Teaming, Scheming & Deception