The Summer 2026 program will run from June through August. It will be largest MATS program to date with 120 fellows and 100 mentors. Fellows will be connected with mentors or organizational research groups, such as Anthropic's Alignment Science team, UK AISI, Redwood Research, ARC, and LawZero, to collaborate on a research project over the summer. Some fellows will be offered a 6+ month extension to continue this collaboration.
Applications are now closed.

Key dates for the application and admissions timeline
Applications typically open several months before the program begins. Applicants complete a multi-stage admissions process, beginning with a general application. Depending on the tracks, streams, and mentors they apply to, applicants may also complete additional evaluations such as interviews, work tests, coding assessments, or writing samples before final admissions decisions are made.
The main program is a 10 to 12 week full-time research fellowship. Fellows work closely with one or more mentors on independent research projects while participating in workshops, talks, office hours, and the broader MATS community. Research directions are developed collaboratively with mentors, with increasing independence throughout the program.
The extension phase typically begins approximately two weeks after the main program concludes. Fellows who demonstrate strong research potential during the main program may apply for a funded 6 to 12 month extension. Extension fellows continue developing independent research with ongoing mentorship and support, typically working from MATS offices or other approved research locations. In recent cohorts, roughly 80% of fellows who applied to the extension phase were accepted.
MATS aims to accelerate researchers who will:
MATS alumni have gone on to publish safety research, join alignment organizations, including Anthropic and MIRI, and found an alignment research lab. You can read more about MATS alumni here.
Each MATS stream brings together scholars and mentors around a shared research agenda. Streams vary in methodology and focus area, spanning topics such as interpretability, control, evaluations, governance, cybersecurity, and agent foundations.
In the face of disaster, I suspect the government will be forced to play insurer of last resort, whether for a particular lab, or society at large. (I'm not the only one to suspect this – see e.g. here). Designed well, I believe a federal insurance backstop could internalize catastrophic negative externalities; designed poorly, it will simply be a subsidy for AI companies. I want to design the good version, so we have it ready.
I encourage people with mechanism design (a.k.a. reverse game theory) expertise to apply, but don't be deterred if you don't have this expertise.
1 hour weekly meetings by default for high-level guidance. I'm active on Slack and typically respond within a day for quick questions or conceptual (not code) debugging. Between meetings, expect async back-and-forth on paper structure, or experiment design and results. Scholars can also schedule ad-hoc calls if they're stuck or want to brainstorm—just ping me on Slack.
Depending on the project, I may help with writing.
If interested in the technical paper, applicants must:
For all applicants:
Preferred:
Nice to haves:
Not a good fit:
For technical versions of this project, I suspect the project will automatically be fairly tightly scoped based on the scholar's expertise. I will pose the core challenge and over the first week, the scholar and I will hammer out exactly what theoretical questions need answering + empirical surveys need running.
For non-technical versions of this project, I will pitch a few different projects and scholars will try ones they find interesting for a week. In week 2 we'll settle on one together.
This stream focuses on representations that underlie how language models generalize, for example representations of personas, goals, or training data components.
1 hour/week meetings + async discussions in Slack threads; can schedule additional meetings ad hoc as needed.
Essential:
Preferred:
We'll go through potential projects at the beginning, and scholars can propose alternatives. Scholars should explore the first week or two, and decide on a project direction in the second week.
We study applications of singular learning theory (SLT) to AI safety, with a focus on interpretability and alignment. Ideal candidates come from a strong technical background in mathematics, physics, computer science, or biology, and aren't afraid to get their hands dirty with ML experiments. We don't expect you to have deep expertise in SLT, but a shallow familiarity will help.
The team will meet weekly together with both mentors. Separately, you will meet 1-on-1 with at least one of the mentors every other week. We conduct our asynchronous communications through an internal Discord server. We expect you to schedule additional pair-programming/debugging calls with other people on the team as needed.
We'll help with research obstacles, including outside of meetings.
If you're interested in working on more of the empirical side, you should have prior experience with ML engineering (at least at the level of a program like ARENA) and prior research experience (potentially in a field outside of ML). A bonus would be prior familiarity with designing and running ML experiments or research specifically in AI safety.
If you're interested in working on more of the theoretical side, you should have prior research experience in a relevant field like mathematics, theoretical physics, or theoretical computer science.
Please make sure that your background and interests are clearly described in your application. By default, we'll be looking for evidence of research ability in the form of publications.
We do not expect you to already be aware of SLT, but if you pass the first round, please prepare by conducting some background reading (see: timaeus.co/learn).
Mentor(s) will talk through project ideas with scholar and suggest several options to choose from.
This stream will focus on monitoring, stress-testing safety methods, and evals, with a focus on risks from scheming AIs. Examples include (black-box) AI control techniques, white-box monitors (probes etc.), chain-of-thought monitoring/faithfulness, building evaluation environments, and stress-testing mitigations.
For each project, we will have a weekly meeting to discuss the overall project direction and prioritize next steps for the upcoming week. On a day-to-day basis, you will discuss experiments and write code with other mentees on the project (though I'm available on Slack for quick feedback between meetings or to address things that are blocking you).
I structure the program around collaborative, team-based research projects. You will work in a small team, on a project from a predefined list. I organize the 12-week program into fast-paced research sprints designed to create and keep research velocity, so you should expect regular deadlines and milestones. I will provide a more detailed schedule and set of milestones at the beginning of the program.
I am looking for scholars with strong machine learning engineering skills, as well as a background in technical research. While I’ll provide weekly guidance on research, I expect scholars to be able to run experiments and decide on low-level details fairly independently most of the time. I’ll propose concrete projects to choose from, so you should not expect to work on your own research idea during MATS. I strongly encourage collaboration within the stream, so you should expect to work in teams of 2-3 scholars on a project, hence good communication and team skills are important.
We will most likely have a joint project selection phase, where we present a list of projects (with the option for scholars to iterate on them). Afterward, each project will have at least one main mentor, but we might also co-mentor some projects.
In this project, we will explore GPU side-channel attacks to extract information about model usage. A simple example is to observe (via radio, power fluctuations, acoustics, etc.) which experts were used in each forward pass of an MOE model, then use those observations to guess which tokens were produced.
Co-working 2-4 hours per week, including detailed guidance. Flexible. 1 hour check-ins per week. You can schedule ad-hoc calls if stuck or wanting to brainstorm.
Please note: experience with hardware is not a requirement for this stream, as long as you are willing to work hard and learn fast, and can show other evidence of exceptional ability. If in doubt: we encourage you to apply!
We will provide you with a lot of autonomy and plug-and-play access to a rare combination of tools and equipment—in exchange we expect you to have a strong self-direction, intellectual ambition, and a lot of curiosity. This stream requires you to have a tight experiment loop to form and test hypotheses on the fly.
Example skill profiles:
Must have: Trained or fine-tuned a transformer language model in PyTorch (toy models and following guides is fine). Familiar with basic electronics concepts (voltage, current, transistors). Has experience writing research papers, even as a class assignment.
Nice to have: Familiarity with LaTeX, PyTorch internals, CUDA/OpenCL, GPU architecture, chip design, oscilloscopes, signal processing, electrical engineering.
There is a cluster of potential projects to choose from. As a team, we will decide which to pursue based on individual interest and skills. Mentors will pitch example projects and scholars can then modify and re-pitch them. Once the research problem, hypothesis, and testing plan are written and agreed on, scholars begin object-level work. We encourage failing fast and jumping to a fallback project.
This stream will focus on evaluating biological AI models for function-based biosecurity screening.
I typically schedule a standing weekly 1:1 meeting with each fellow, and also hold a weekly research group meeting. Beyond that I am available on Slack and can find additional time for calls outside of scheduled meetings.
Note that as part of our Safe and Responsible Research Framework we require fellows to sign a fellowship agreement covering confidentiality and pre-publication review for dual-use risks. This is common practice in biosecurity research and allows us to work freely together on sensitive material.
Required:
• Prior technical research experience
• Strong critical thinking and creative problem-solving abilities
• The integrity and judgment to responsibly carry out sensitive research
• A good understanding of the basics of biomolecular sequence, structure, and function
• Expertise in one or more of the following domains:
bioinformatics, computational biology, structural biology, biochemistry, molecular biophysics, protein engineering, biosecurity, AI/ML, or a related field
• Proficiency with Python
Preferred:
• Hands-on experience with testing biological AI models
• Have built model evaluations / benchmarks
• Experience with mechanistic interpretability techniques
• Biosecurity context awareness
Fellows who are interested in our research area should think of potential project ideas that leverage their strengths and interests. I will work with individual fellows to identify a specific project that matches their background and interests and is aligned with our overall research direction, and to refine the scope and objectives of the project.
I'm interested in mentoring projects related to reward hacking and monitoring (agentic) models that produce long and complex trajectories. Scholar will have freedom to propose projects within this scope. Expect 30-60min 1-1 time on zoom.
30min to 1 hour weekly meetings (on zoom) by default for high-level guidance. I'm active on Slack and typically respond within a day for quick questions or conceptual (not code) debugging. Expect async back-and-forth on experiment design and results between meetings. Scholars can also schedule ad-hoc calls if they're stuck or want to brainstorm—just ping me on Slack.
Week 1-2: Mentor will provide high level directions or problems to work on, and scholar will have the freedom to propose specific projects and discuss with mentor.
Week 3: Figure out detailed plan of the project.
A track is a broad research area within MATS. Empirical, Theory, Strategy & Forecasting, Policy & Governance, Systems Security, Founder & Field-Building, and Biosecurity are our current tracks. Each track contains multiple streams. In Stage 1, you apply to tracks.
Streams are organized around a research agenda, led by one or more mentors who guide fellows through related projects. In Stage 2, applicants apply to streams within tracks based on research that interests them.
You may apply to as many tracks as you wish at Stage 1. At Stage 2, depending on which tracks you progress in, you may then apply to as many streams as you wish within those tracks; there is no cap. The process is comparable to applying to PhD supervisors.
We want to be flexible for applicants who have urgent prior commitments. Based on individual circumstances, we may be willing to alter the time commitment of the program and allow fellows to leave early or arrive late. Please inform us of your availability in the application process.
Applicants who will be 18 years or older before the program start date are eligible to apply. Both US and non-US citizens are eligible to apply. All backgrounds and levels of experience are welcome and prior AI safety experience is not required.
Yes. The 12-week program requires fellows to commit 40 hours per week to their MATS research. For exceptionally strong candidates with significant concurrent responsibilities, the time commitment can be reduced to 20 hours per week on a case-by-case review. However, the program maintains an expectation of sustained, high-level engagement, including regular participation in core activities and most organized events. Candidates that require a J1 visa to come to the US are unable to participate part time; they can only work part time if they participate remotely or from the UK.
Yes, upon submitting you will receive a link that lets you edit your response. Please note that you will not be able to edit your response once the application period ends.
LLMs may not be used to write any part of your application unless specific work tests or forms explicitly permit it. MATS monitors for LLM use, and applicants found to have used LLMs may be disqualified.
Depending on the evaluations of the tracks and streams you apply to in Stages 1 and 2, we will contact your references. We will send them a form with our own set of questions, so they will not have to prepare a reference letter.
Although MATS sometimes supports UC Berkeley-based mentors, MATS is an independent program and is not formally part of UC Berkeley. As such, MATS will not be providing student cards to our scholars.
The main program, or Research Phase, takes place in person in Berkeley, CA and London, UK. Historically, most fellows participate from Berkeley. London is typically chosen by fellows who want to co-locate with their mentor or who have a preference to work from the UK instead of US.Will this program be remote or in-person?
The main program, or the Research Phase takes place in Berkeley, CA and London, UK, with the majority of fellows participating from Berkeley. We strongly encourage in-person participation when possible, as a core part of the program experience comes from day-to-day interactions with your cohort and others in the broader AI safety ecosystem.
Decisions about remote participation are made on a case-by-case basis and depend primarily on mentor preferences, many of whom are open to the possibility, especially if you have family or other obligations that make in-person participation difficult. We strongly encourage in-person participation when possible, as a core part of the program experience comes from day-to-day interactions with your cohort and others in the broader AI safety ecosystem.
If you have difficulties in securing a visa to participate from Berkeley, we are likely to be able to support participation from our London office.The 6–12 month extension gives fellows the option to participate from Berkeley, London, or remotely.
MATS is a scientific and educational seminar and independent research program, and provides J1 visas for non-American participants. Participants can also opt to participate from our London office; however, please note that visa support is not available for that option.
During the main program, fellows should expect to meet with their mentor for at least one hour per week, with more frequent communication via Slack. The extent of mentor support will vary depending on the project and the mentor.
Fellows will also receive support from MATS’ Research Management team, who work with mentors by tracking scholar research progress, unblocking scholar research, and assisting with grant applications and deadlines.
Fellows develop as researchers by working with an experienced research mentor, interacting with other fellows, and receiving support from our Research Management team. Research managers meet weekly with most fellows and mentors and help with research strategy, research unblocking, and project coordination.
Other forms of training include workshops on different parts of the research process and seminars on a variety of AI technical safety and governance research.
Throughout the program, each fellow will work on an independent research project with input and guidance from your mentor(s). Depending on which stream you participate in, you may collaborate with other fellows in your stream.
Traditionally, fellows submit a Research Plan midway through the program and present their research at the Fellow Symposium at the end of the program.
We welcome feedback. For feedback for the whole team (visible by all MATS staff), please use this form. For feedback that will only be visible to the Co-Executive Directors, Ryan and Christian, please submit here.
You can contact the MATS Board of Directors using this linked form (responses are only viewable by the Board). Please only use this if you feel your question or concern requires board-level attention.