Stream overview

Projects will be theoretical in flavour, but I expect to work with fellows over the first few weeks to find projects that match their interests. They will generally center around the mechanistic estimation of quantities traditionally estimated via randomised methods (see for example https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.05179), or developing heuristic explanations for mathematical statements. Alternatively, fellows may take a more abstract route and work on the theory of heuristic arguments themselves, for example by broadening our understanding of No-coincidence Principles.

Mentors

No items found.

Mentorship style

Fellows we are looking for

Essential:

  • Mathematical maturity and a math, physics or computer science background at the level of a strong undergraduate at a top-20 university.
  • Good at communicating about technical topics.
  • Able to work in person in London, at either the MATS offices or LISA.

Preferred:

  • Ability to do productive research in the absence of formal problem statements.

Optional extras:

  • Background in ML theory and/or theoretical CS.
  • Basic ML engineering experience, such as running experiments on small neural nets.

Project selection

I will discuss a few projects with each fellow, and give time for fellows to work on each problem to get a sense of which ones they would like to move forward with. I would expect fellows to be working almost entirely on a single problem by the third week.

Streams

The Winter 2026 cohort offers a wide range of research streams led by experts across AI alignment, interpretability, governance, and safety. Each stream provides its own research agenda, methodology, and mentorship focus.

SF Bay Area
Dangerous Capability Evals
Boston
Policy and Governance
Adversarial Robustness, Policy & Governance, Red-Teaming, Safeguards
New York City
Control, Scalable Oversight, Red-Teaming, Model Organisms, Monitoring
SF Bay Area
Policy and Governance
Policy & Governance
SF Bay Area
Control, Monitoring, Dangerous Capability Evals
SF Bay Area
Security, Compute Infrastructure
London
Theory
Interpretability
London
Scheming & Deception, Dangerous Capability Evals, Control, Red-Teaming
SF Bay Area
Dangerous Capability Evals, Red-Teaming, Model Organisms, Control, Monitoring
Toronto
Interpretability
London
Control, Monitoring, Safeguards, Dangerous Capability Evals, Scheming & Deception
Chicago
Biorisk, Security, Safeguards
SF Bay Area
Interpretability, Agent Foundations
London
Empirical
Interpretability
London
Interpretability, Red-Teaming, Monitoring
London
Monitoring, Adversarial Robustness, Control, Model Organisms, Red-Teaming, Dangerous Capability Evals, Safeguards
New York City
Policy and Governance
Dangerous Capability Evals, Control, Strategy & Forecasting, Policy & Governance, Scalable Oversight, Agent Foundations
SF Bay Area
Empirical
Theory
Dangerous Capability Evals, Adversarial Robustness, Security, Red-Teaming, Scalable Oversight
London
Control, Scheming & Deception, Dangerous Capability Evals, Monitoring
Washington, D.C.
Policy and Governance
Policy & Governance, Strategy & Forecasting